Review



cross section observation  (JEOL)


Bioz Verified Symbol JEOL is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol JEOL manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    JEOL cross section observation
    Cross Section Observation, supplied by JEOL, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 13532 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cross+sections/JSM-7800F+Scanning+Electron+Microscope/us12614732-322-4-16
    Average 99 stars, based on 13532 article reviews
    cross section observation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    Hitachi Ltd cross section
    Cross Section, supplied by Hitachi Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cross+sections/SU8600/us12630479-193-16-28
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cross section - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    JEOL cross section observation
    Cross Section Observation, supplied by JEOL, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cross+sections/JSM-7800F+Scanning+Electron+Microscope/us12614732-322-4-16
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cross section observation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Fukui Bank Ltd cross sectional surveys
    Risk of bias of included studies, by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist: ( A ) qualitative (n = 24); ( B <t>)</t> <t>cross-sectional</t> (n = 13); ( C ) randomized controlled trials (n = 7); ( D ) quasi-experimental (n = 2). Bars show the proportion of studies rated low (green), unclear (yellow), or high (red) risk. Mixed-methods studies were appraised under more than one checklist. For each panel, n is the number of studies appraised with that JBI checklist; the four mixed-methods studies were each appraised under two checklists, so the panel totals (46) exceed the 42 included studies.
    Cross Sectional Surveys, supplied by Fukui Bank Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cross+sections/cross+sectional+surveys/pmc13282983-12-0-10
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cross sectional surveys - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Skyscan Corporation cross sectional images
    Risk of bias of included studies, by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist: ( A ) qualitative (n = 24); ( B <t>)</t> <t>cross-sectional</t> (n = 13); ( C ) randomized controlled trials (n = 7); ( D ) quasi-experimental (n = 2). Bars show the proportion of studies rated low (green), unclear (yellow), or high (red) risk. Mixed-methods studies were appraised under more than one checklist. For each panel, n is the number of studies appraised with that JBI checklist; the four mixed-methods studies were each appraised under two checklists, so the panel totals (46) exceed the 42 included studies.
    Cross Sectional Images, supplied by Skyscan Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cross+sections/nrecon+software/pm42248562-57-5-9
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cross sectional images - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Tabuk Pharmaceuticals cross sectional 574 children
    Risk of bias of included studies, by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist: ( A ) qualitative (n = 24); ( B <t>)</t> <t>cross-sectional</t> (n = 13); ( C ) randomized controlled trials (n = 7); ( D ) quasi-experimental (n = 2). Bars show the proportion of studies rated low (green), unclear (yellow), or high (red) risk. Mixed-methods studies were appraised under more than one checklist. For each panel, n is the number of studies appraised with that JBI checklist; the four mixed-methods studies were each appraised under two checklists, so the panel totals (46) exceed the 42 included studies.
    Cross Sectional 574 Children, supplied by Tabuk Pharmaceuticals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cross+sections/574+children+cross+sectional/pm42257803-82-4-9
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cross sectional 574 children - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Kaesler Nutrition moderate cross sectional ckd 3 4 gckd cohort
    Risk of bias of included studies, by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist: ( A ) qualitative (n = 24); ( B <t>)</t> <t>cross-sectional</t> (n = 13); ( C ) randomized controlled trials (n = 7); ( D ) quasi-experimental (n = 2). Bars show the proportion of studies rated low (green), unclear (yellow), or high (red) risk. Mixed-methods studies were appraised under more than one checklist. For each panel, n is the number of studies appraised with that JBI checklist; the four mixed-methods studies were each appraised under two checklists, so the panel totals (46) exceed the 42 included studies.
    Moderate Cross Sectional Ckd 3 4 Gckd Cohort, supplied by Kaesler Nutrition, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cross+sections/3+4+ckd+cohort+cross+gckd+moderate+sectional/pm42123943-170-105-101
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    moderate cross sectional ckd 3 4 gckd cohort - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Adelphi Technology Inc cross sectional survey
    Risk of bias of included studies, by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist: ( A ) qualitative (n = 24); ( B <t>)</t> <t>cross-sectional</t> (n = 13); ( C ) randomized controlled trials (n = 7); ( D ) quasi-experimental (n = 2). Bars show the proportion of studies rated low (green), unclear (yellow), or high (red) risk. Mixed-methods studies were appraised under more than one checklist. For each panel, n is the number of studies appraised with that JBI checklist; the four mixed-methods studies were each appraised under two checklists, so the panel totals (46) exceed the 42 included studies.
    Cross Sectional Survey, supplied by Adelphi Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cross+sections/cross+sectional+survey/pmc13247365-24-7-9
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cross sectional survey - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Sanhe Great Wall Rubber Co Ltd cross sectional survey
    Risk of bias of included studies, by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist: ( A ) qualitative (n = 24); ( B <t>)</t> <t>cross-sectional</t> (n = 13); ( C ) randomized controlled trials (n = 7); ( D ) quasi-experimental (n = 2). Bars show the proportion of studies rated low (green), unclear (yellow), or high (red) risk. Mixed-methods studies were appraised under more than one checklist. For each panel, n is the number of studies appraised with that JBI checklist; the four mixed-methods studies were each appraised under two checklists, so the panel totals (46) exceed the 42 included studies.
    Cross Sectional Survey, supplied by Sanhe Great Wall Rubber Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cross+sections/cross+sectional+survey/pm42086613-49-1-7
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cross sectional survey - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Khanh Hoa Salanganes Nest Company cross sectional hbv serosurvey
    Risk of bias of included studies, by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist: ( A ) qualitative (n = 24); ( B <t>)</t> <t>cross-sectional</t> (n = 13); ( C ) randomized controlled trials (n = 7); ( D ) quasi-experimental (n = 2). Bars show the proportion of studies rated low (green), unclear (yellow), or high (red) risk. Mixed-methods studies were appraised under more than one checklist. For each panel, n is the number of studies appraised with that JBI checklist; the four mixed-methods studies were each appraised under two checklists, so the panel totals (46) exceed the 42 included studies.
    Cross Sectional Hbv Serosurvey, supplied by Khanh Hoa Salanganes Nest Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cross+sections/cross+hbv+sectional+serosurvey/pm42050632-53-4-16
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cross sectional hbv serosurvey - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Risk of bias of included studies, by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist: ( A ) qualitative (n = 24); ( B ) cross-sectional (n = 13); ( C ) randomized controlled trials (n = 7); ( D ) quasi-experimental (n = 2). Bars show the proportion of studies rated low (green), unclear (yellow), or high (red) risk. Mixed-methods studies were appraised under more than one checklist. For each panel, n is the number of studies appraised with that JBI checklist; the four mixed-methods studies were each appraised under two checklists, so the panel totals (46) exceed the 42 included studies.

    Journal: Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare

    Article Title: Bridging the Gap Between Efficacy and Practice: A Systematic Review of Shared Decision-Making in Severe Mental Illness

    doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S610845

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Risk of bias of included studies, by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist: ( A ) qualitative (n = 24); ( B ) cross-sectional (n = 13); ( C ) randomized controlled trials (n = 7); ( D ) quasi-experimental (n = 2). Bars show the proportion of studies rated low (green), unclear (yellow), or high (red) risk. Mixed-methods studies were appraised under more than one checklist. For each panel, n is the number of studies appraised with that JBI checklist; the four mixed-methods studies were each appraised under two checklists, so the panel totals (46) exceed the 42 included studies.

    Article Snippet: Cross-sectional surveys , 13 (31.0) , De las Cuevas (2014a,2014b); Fukui (2014); Hamann, Bühner (2017); Hamann, Kissling (2016); Haugom (2023); Ismail (2021); Morán-Sánchez (2019); Mundal (2021); Renes (2024); Schuster (2021); Solberg (2014); Yeo (2021).

    Techniques: